🔗 Share this article

Only 48 hours prior to the NYC mayoral election, Michael Lange made a bold electoral prediction – not just who would win citywide, and precinct by precinct. The analyst, an expert in elections born and raised in the city, devoted more than ten years in left-leaning activism and emerged as a kind of well-known figure recently for his thorough analyses into municipal statistics and voter surveys.

He published his extremely precise forecast map – accurately predicting that Zohran Mamdani would win although failed to predict the independent candidate’s solid showing – on his Substack, the Narrative War. Lange has a flair for clever terms. He highlighted, for instance, the split between the “commie corridor”, running from Park Slope to Bushwick to Astoria, where he predicted (correctly) that Mamdani would win by huge margins, and the conservative-leaning zone on affluent parts of Manhattan. There, certain media outlets and Wall Street Journal outrank the New York Times” in audience and most voters favored Cuomo, who ran as a moderate alternative.

Voting Day Patterns and Surprises

How was your election night?

It was necessary since they were dropping approximately 200K ballots into the system frequently! I was actually somewhat anxious initially: Mamdani was ahead the early vote by a dozen percentage points, but there were two big batches of ballots that came in after that and his lead went from 12% to 8%. I was worried.

Understand, it was possible in which election day went kind of poorly for Mamdani, where Cuomo would have essentially doubling his votes from the earlier contest. However Mamdani added half a million votes to his initial base, and this was critical why he won. He went out and massively expanded his support from the first round.

Expanding Support

How did Mamdani get those extra votes from?

He built the alliance that progressives always wanted to build: diverse racially, youthful, it’s renters and it’s people facing cost pressures. He gained significantly with Black and Hispanic voters, working- and middle-class voters, compared to the earlier election. Additionally he further maximized his base of left-leaning activists, youthful radicals, and immigrant groups. He couldn’t have won without making those significant inroads.

He built the alliance that the left long aimed for: diverse, youthful, tenants and people squeezed by affordability

Additionally, there were some Trump/Mamdani voters – is this significant?

It is a genuine phenomenon, confined to Hispanic laborers, south Asians and Muslims. Electors in ethnic enclaves that supported Trump last year went for Zohran this year. But it’s not that he was winning over Caucasian laborers and Maga voters.

Voter Participation and Impact

A major development of the election was the sky-high participation. Who did that help?

Both sides. Participation was much greater than anticipated. I thought it could go over 2 million, but it’s closer to 2.3M – that is a lot of darn voters. Existed a decent anti-Mamdani block, who were motivated, but the Mamdani base was equally driven, and that was enough to win.

You predicted he’d get over 50% of the vote. Is he likely for that?

Right now it appears he’s likely to surpass 50%. He’s at 50.4% but there’s still around 200,000 votes uncounted as of Wednesday morning. So I don’t think it’s definitive, but I think probable, and I wish he achieves it because afterwards none can claim Sliwa was a spoiler.

GOP Decline

The GOP candidate, the conservative contender, was another surprise. His support plummeted.

He lost any district in any borough. Not even one neighborhood in the borough, which is like an 88% Trump neighborhood. That truly was unexpected. Cuomo held very white areas, very wealthy areas and very religiously Jewish areas, and plus gained many Republicans on Staten Island with a strong turnout. I think there was significant strategic balloting by GOP voters. This happened before Trump tweeted his support for the candidate, but it assisted. It might have changed the outcome if the winning alliance failed to expand.

The “Commie Corridor”

What about your often-discussed left-wing base – did backing for the candidate dominant in those parts of the boroughs?

I think there was a little dilution of the progressive zone in certain places like neighborhoods that have more older white ethnic folks. There, for example, the property owners and homeowners supported Cuomo. Thus there existed a little resistance. However overall, largely the leftist base is another huge reason why Mamdani won – he scored between high percentages in specific neighborhoods.

Jewish Voters

Prior to the vote we reported on whether Mamdani was making inroads with the community. Any indication that he succeeded?

Exist neighborhoods with many non-religious and left-inclined voters – like Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he did well. But in the affluent districts such as the Upper East Side, his Middle East stance was influential there. Similarly in the moderate communities like Queens neighborhoods, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they favored Cuomo. Plus, you have Jewish immigrants from Eastern Europe in the borough, they were strongly Cuomo. Therefore it’s unclear if there were crazy narrative-busters here, but he retained more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and including sections of the another locale with large leads.

Long-Term Significance

Has Mamdani rewritten what New York means politically? Will the commie corridor become a launch pad for progressive contenders?

Yes, it’s not accidental that some of the biggest figures from progressives come from a few areas in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I believe that there will be additional examples – candidates will come from these neighborhoods to be elevated nationally.

However I think that each urban center in America could develop similar progressive hubs. Urban places are the epicenters of leftwing power in the nation – since youth reside there, tenancy is common and they are places where individuals struggle by the disparities we face.